DC's

The blog of author Dennis Cooper

Roland Topor’s Brain

—-

 

‘Roland Topor was the modern enfant terrible of French art and letters. He was short and leprechaun-like, giving the impression of constant, untiring activity. He dabbled in films, produced art derived from Surrealism, and could seldom be accused of good taste. In 1962, he created the Panic Movement (mouvement panique), together with Alejandro Jodorowsky and Fernando Arrabal. Inspired by and named after the god Pan, and influenced by Luis Buñuel and Antonin Artaud’s Theatre of Cruelty, the group concentrated on chaotic performance art and surreal imagery. Among the films made from Topor’s written work was Roman Polanski’s The Tenant (1976), which was recently reissued in 2006 with an introduction by the writer Thomas Ligotti. Topor also worked as an actor, his most famous part being Renfield in Werner Herzog’s Nosferatu: Phantom der Nacht (1979).

‘His greatest success was as a macabre cartoonist. He used his work to illustrate his novels, plays and other writings, produced many volumes of graphics, and exhibited his work widely in galleries both in France and abroad. His drawings in many ways resembled the graphic novels of Max Ernst and the similarly grim work of the Alsatian artist Tomi Ungerer, but the humour was always there in the absurd situations he depicted, many based on fantastical images of the deeper associations of sex and erotica, others on pictures that linked mankind to the world of worms and insects or reptiles.

‘Although ebullient in public, it was known among his friends that he had black periods of extreme depression, and the bizarre fantasies that he drew and painted undoubtedly reflected a mind that brooded on death and decay and the many germs and viruses that live in our bodies. His novels tackled the same themes, cruelty and metamorphosis being depicted in a matter-of-fact, unemotional way, his characters Rabelaisian and his plots stretching the imagination to its limits. Coprophagy is a frequent theme and religion a favourite target in much of his work. Giving offence came so naturally to Topor that he was almost unaware of the shocked reactions he was likely to get, as for instance from the series of dialogues, accompanied by drawings, examining all the possible uses of a baby, starting by nailing one to your front door.

‘Toward the end of his life, Topor wrote the screenplay for the cultishly revered film Marquis (1989), directed by Henri Xhonneux and loosely based on the life and writings of Marquis de Sade. The cast consisted of actors in period costumes with animal masks, with a separate puppet for de Sade’s anthropomorphised “bodily appendage.” He also co-wrote and was the production designer of the innovative and popular animated film Fantastic Planet, directed by René Laloux. At the age of 59 Topor suffered a massive stroke and brain haemorrhage in 1997, having appeared until then in the best of health.’ — collaged from various sources

 


Roland Topor’s self-designed grave marker

 

______
Further

Topor et moi: A Roland Topor Resource
Roland Topor Page @ Facebook
Books in English by Roland Topor
Roland Topor’s books @ goodreads
A Roland Topor Photo Gallery
Roland Topor posts @ Thomas Ligotti Online
‘Roland Topor, a Graphic Wit’ @ The New York Times
‘The Wilder Planet of Roland Topor’

 

______
Portrait Gallery

 

____
Films

Les Escargot (1965) was a collaboration between Roland Topor and director Renee Laloux, but it is Topor’s distinctive visual sensibility that dominates. Les Escargot is apocalyptic, teeming with allegory of self-perpetuated human destruction. Like in other works by Topor, the ordinary is blown up to monstrous and absurd proportions. Fed by plants stimulated by human tears, enormous garden snails run amok, destroying the cities.’ — Ashcan Magazine

 

‘What is man ? Man makes war, man kills man, man hunts, man is executed. Les Temps Morte (1966) is montage film mixing original drawings by Roland Topor and direction by Rene Laloux involving both original shots and stock shots that ironically analyze what man is.’ — worldnews

 

‘Roland Topor and René Laloux’s Fantastic Planet (1973) is a sci-fi epic like none you’ve ever seen. A 70’s euro-funk soundtrack backs the eerie psychedelic visuals of an alien world. On the fantastic planet, humans are kept as pets by the gigantic Oms, a blue-skinned humanoid species who live for thousands of years and have a highly evolved culture and technology. Revolutionary metaphors abound, and like much science fiction literature, but unlike most science fiction movies, the film is really about our contemporary situation despite the fantastical setting.’ — Justin Allen


Trailer


Excerpt


Roland Topor: The Unrecognizable Genius Behind FANTASTIC PLANET

Watch the film here

 

‘Roland Topor and Henri Xhonneux’s Marquis (1989) is an audacious rendering of the political, social and sexual manners of the ancien regime and the class division and social disruption that produced the French Revolution. Adapted from the writings of the Marquis de Sade, this witty film uses elaborate puppets in human form to act out erotic and sexual decadence. Marquis is an elegantly naughty film with wry, intellectual satire that plays out all manner of human desire.’ — J. Hoberman

Watch the film here

 

__________
Miscelaneous


Roland Topor in Herzog’s ‘Nosferatu’


Roland Topor [1983] : Les archives de Radio Nova


Roland Topor, un petit film

 

________________
100 Good Reasons to Kill Myself Right Now
by Roland Topor

 

1) Best way to make sure I’m not dead already.
2) It’ll throw off the last census.
3) They’re waiting on me down below to start the party.
4) They shoot horses, don’t they?
5) I’ll rise in the esteem of my peers.
6) I’ll no longer dread the millennium.
7) Just like Werther! They won’t call me ill-read anymore.
8) I’d make a fool of my cancer.
9) I’d make a liar of my horoscope.
10) To be my therapist’s ruin.
11) To get out of voting.
12) An infallible cure for baldness.
13) To make a fresh start!
14) Death ennobles: knighthood at last!
15) I’d feel less alone.
16) I’d be fêted next All Saints’ Day.
17) The cost of living rises, but death remains affordable.
18) Good way to find your roots.
19) Finally, a martial arts move I can manage.
20) To be green and fertilize the lawn.
21) To mark the day with a white stone.
22) Others could put my organs to better use.
23) To make way for youth.
24) At last, a starring role!
25) To take advantage of the exhibitionism inherent in dissection tables.
26) To taste the subtle delights of reincarnation.
27) The nightmare of leap years, over at last!
28) To give my body of work a moral dimension.
29) To make people think I’m honorable.
30) To turn this list into a last will and testament.
31) I’ll become a citizen of the world.
32) Euthanasia wasn’t made for dogs.
33) I’ll have the last word.
34) 67% of French people support the death penalty.
35) ‘Cause it’s a good way to quit smoking.
36) To simplify my duality: I’ll see things more clearly with only one of me left.
37) A deliverance less laborious than a delivery.
38) There’s nothing left to do.
39) I don’t want to aggravate my lack of social security.
40) To kill a Jew, like everyone else.
41) To join the silent majority. The real one.
42) To leave behind a widow simply bursting with youth.
43) I can’t live in worry now that my deodorant’s stopped working.
44) To dodge the general draft.
45) To preserve the mystery surrounding me.
46) To prove the neutron bomb can’t hurt me.
47) To lose weight without a diet, or even lifting a finger!
48) I insist on complying with the federal plan for staggered vacations.
49) I’m trying to spare someone else the unfortunate consequences of an assassination.
50) To save energy, coffee, and sugar.
51) So I won’t be ashamed to look in the mirror anymore.
52) What if I’m immortal? Might as well find out as soon as possible.
53) One less mouth to feed.
54) To prove to EVERYONE that I’m no coward.
55) To count how many people cry at my funeral.
56) To see, from the other side, if I’ve made it over.
57) Instead of tearing my gray hairs out one by one, might as well tear my head off all at once.
58) With a revolver: to be noisy after 10pm.
59) With gas: to savor the charms of that last cigarette.
60) By hanging: to turn an ordinary rope into a delightful good luck charm.
61) Under a train: to extend other people’s vacations.
62) With barbiturates: think I’ll sleep in tomorrow morning.
63) By electrocution: to shake things up a little.
64) By defenestration: to escape my fear of elevators.
65) I’ve heard death is an easy lay. I’m gonna have me some good times.
66) If I put my subscriptions on hold, I won’t miss a thing.
67) To be good with (tiny) animals.
68) To die the same year as Elvis.
69) To skip out on taxes.
70) To skip out on rent.
71) To stop snoring.
72) To come back in the wee hours and tug on my enemies’ feet.
73) To keep from ripping myself off as I get older, like de Chirico.
74) Because I’m an endangered species and no one is protecting me.
75) Because I’ve prepared a choice phrase for the final moment, and if I wait too long I’ll forget it.
76) To sever my umbilical cord once and for all.
77) To be the founder of a new style: Dead Art.
78) To watch the movie of my life at a very exclusive screening.
79) To see if there are any virgins left on the other side.
80) So they’ll deck me out when they lay me out.
81) Because I can’t wait to use the amusing epitaph I made up: GOOD RIDDANCE.
82) To see if paralytics will be healed on my tomb.
83) So the twentieth century will finally contain an important event.
84) To feast on the exquisite blood of young women, once I’m a vampire.
85) Because I’ve always wanted to speak a dead tongue.
86) So I can, quite strikingly, inform everyone of my position on suicide.
87) Because Paris just isn’t what it used to be.
88) Because Groucho Marx is dead.
89) Because I’ve read all the adventures of Sherlock Holmes.
90) Because weather forecasts let me down.
91) So others will follow my example.
92) To start a revolution.
93) To prove my skill, if I don’t miss.
94) For a change of friends.
95) For a change of scene.
96) To be above the law.
97) Because a well-done suicide is worth more than an average lay.
98) So I won’t die at a hospital.
99) So my blood will make a nice stain on a canvas.
100) Because I’ve got 1,000 good reasons to hate myself.

 

________________
Drawings & paintings


—-

 

*

p.s. Hey. ** l@rst, For sure. Hey, L! ** _Black_Acrylic, I love the Chucky movies. I wish they’d make a new one, but they’d probably use AI and fuck it up. I remember ‘Bride of Chucky’ being especially fun, but I don’t know. ** kenley, Good morning to you, kenley! Yeah, the immersive art thing is just high tech banality from everything I’ve seen. They make you appreciate how great windows are. Um, I’ve been to theater pieces where you walk through a space or building and the piece unfolds as you move around. I went to that famous one where you’re a guest at, I think, Tony and (someone’s) wedding. That was irksome. And of course some haunted houses that do that — minimalist with lots of projections and effects and ‘scary’ monologues, as they were quite the trendy Halloween thing for a while. I like old school haunted houses where there’s a kind of theater element. Where your traversing of the haunt is interrupted with little play-like scenes that give the experience a kind of narrative. So, in that sense, I have, I guess. And I do think haunts are the best context for that kind of thing. I’ll be onto Peter  Vack as soon as I finish having to reapply for my French visa, as that’s kind of eating my brain and stressing me out at the moment. Thanks! ** Carsten, I did read his Wenders thing, yeah, nice. I’m ok with Wenders up through ‘Wings of Desire’, but nothing since then. And I never thought he was remotely great. I like Kid Congo Powers. I’ve peripherally known him since he was the President of the LA chapter of The Ramones Fan Club when he was a teen. They showed a whole bunch of Frampton’s films. The ones I can remember at the moment were ‘Pas de Trois’, ‘Public Domain’, ‘Cadenzas I & XIV’, and ‘Gloria!’. ** Dominik, Hi!!! I’m so happy you liked it. I have a hard time with TV series anyway, and I have a hard time settling for better than average shows, and it’s probably also because the two main actors in the show look so blandly conventionally clean cut ‘attractive’ that I can’t imagine being interested in whoever they play. I like winter, but it’s been chilly and rainy here every day for way too long. It’s the sameness that’s getting kind of crazy making, I guess. I volunteer to be a consultant on love’s true crime show. Love wondering what it’s like to take a bubble bath but not enough to actually take one, G. ** Thom, Thanks, Thom, I look forward to listening! I’ll put on my conceptual cap while I listen. I like pop songs, or, well, attempts to ace ones. (see: this weekend’s post) Robert Pollard is my living god, after all. If the ‘Glossolalia’ album is there, I’ll hit that up too. Thank you about ‘God Jr’. Short novels rule. It’s stupid that in the US novels are rarely taken seriously by the literary cognoscenti unless they’re giant-sized. Yeah, Heikens’ isn’t my usual thing, but something about them made me itchy. Happy day! ** Steve, I ate at the defunct Chinese place the previous time I was in NYC, and it was packed. ‘Iron Lung’ isn’t here yet, and I haven’t found it on the free sites so far. I saw ‘Goodbar’ when it was released, and I hardly remember it other than not being as disturbed by it as it clearly intended. I’d be curious to visit it again now, yeah. ** Bill, Yeah, ‘It Was Just an Accident’ snuck through. ‘Reflections in a Dead Diamond’: nice title. ** Uday, That’s understandable. Great, just enjoy NYC’s vast and uneven pleasures. Breakfast … no, not normally. Just coffee. Although I do like breakfast for dinner sometimes. I like omelettes and hash browns and buttered toast. ** HaRpEr //, At their best they’re kind of like G-rated Guro. Now I have to go watch ‘The Trial’ so I can see that bedroom. I was just reading about ‘Actors’. How strange. Maybe it was programmed at the Berlinale? I can’t remember. Poetry chapbook, cool. Kind of a lost great form, I think? ** horatio, Hey! Thank you, thank you for your letter/care package! The collages have been staring at me from atop a stack of unread books at the back of my desk for days now. They’re wonderful. And thank you for the recipe. I’m going to have to see if I can do it without the salmon because I’m vegetarian, but I’m sure I can sort out an alternative. Anyway, that was and is so great of you! Thank you, my friend! Yeah, when I wrote ‘Closer’ I had this idea that the equal length/size paragraphs would have this kind of trancey effect, like a train going over train tracks or something, that would counteract the attention the reader had to pay to the characters and story and so on and create a kind of crosshatched effect. It was a style I was super into for a while. Thank you for noting it. How are you? What’re you doing of late? ** darbz (⊙ 0⊙ ), Oh, gosh, how did the interview go? No news on the possible NC screening yet, but I hope to hear something soon. We just set up screenings in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, but that won’t help you. I love the pix of you! You look very, very cool! Big up about the Machinegirl gig. Oh, I missed your question? I guess they either duck under a very tall tree or they just tough it out? Good question. ** Okay. I did a post here about Roland Topor years ago, and I went back to restore it, and I thought it was crappy, so I just made a whole new Roland Topor post. A bit of behind-the-scenes trivia for you there. See you tomorrow.

Galerie Denis Cooper presents … Harma Heikens

—-

 

‘For the past few years, Dutch artist Harma Heikens has been drawing on subjects from the edge of our consumer society. She reveals that which is not usually clearly visible in a world that is obsessed by a flawless exterior. It’s the flip side of things that matters to her, as illustrated by an early drawing of “bambi’, not cute at all but throwing up violently. This hidden truth is in the distortion of what should be beautiful and whole, like the bust of Disney’s Sleeping Beauty, her perfect skin covered in sores (or are they zits she’s scratched open?). Heikens takes a sardonic pleasure in tranforming clichés, by undermining the traditional meaning of the toy figures and dolls we know from childhood. Their hidden horrors become visible. She does this with gusto and imagination, and with a lot of conviction. Her latest work is a good example of this. It refers to a consumerism gone haywire, in which people as well as things have a market value. Youth and beauty, though transitory, have become commodities that only the happy few can afford to buy.

‘Harma Heikens wants to show us that all around us monsters are reaching out to youthful beauty in order to feed on it, hoping to regenerate what has been lost. They refuse to believe that there are things that aren’t actually for sale. The work touches on the age-old theme of the battle between thanatos and eros as it manifests itself in modern society. Heikens, with her playful yet forceful imagery holds up a mirror to us all.’ — Margriet Kruyver, aeroplastics contemporary

‘To compare and contrast cute with confrontational is a typical and all too simple response when observing one of Harma Heikens’ near life-size sculptures for the first time. True, they are confrontational but the larger than life charm of Harma’s arrangements are powerfully thought-provoking allegories; Her description of her work is precise and understated. “I’m not into telling people that they see things the ‘wrong’ way,” says the Netherland artist. “When I make a sculpture of, say, a Latin-American or Asian looking child in horrible circumstances it is perceived as social criticism, but when I make a sculpture of a white child in a similar situation it is perceived as apocalyptic. That doesn’t feel good and it is confrontational in itself (for whoever wants to see it), but there’s no way of avoiding it. The images I work with sort of pre-exist in people’s minds. It works the same way for me.”

‘And therein lies one of the most appealing aspects of Heikens’ work. It’s not a soapbox stance, but she doesn’t resort to ’leaving it all up to the viewer’ either. What we make of it is an amalgamation of artist intention and our own built-in perceptions culled from our own reference banks.

‘Accessorized with familiar common-place objects these sculptures speak to us using our own universal language: a trash bag, a soda can, a sweater emblazoned with branded apparel. Even their cuteness is part of that language. It coaxes an examination of the debasement of our culture, our societies, our place in time, how far we’ve come – or regressed.’ — Annie Owens

 

Further

Harma Heikens Official Website
HH @ Witzenhausen Gallery
‘Paradise Lost: The Works of Harma Heikens’
The Malformed Kitsch of Harma Heikens’
HH interviewed @ Castle Magazine
‘tweeenentwintig beelden: harma heikens’

 

Extras


Noorderzon doet geen aangifte na dreigement


HARMA HEIKENS Firestarter unboxing by Toy Qube at My Silk Screen Print Shop

 

Interview

 

q)How did you get started making art?

a)I’ve been making things as long as I remember, but didn’t think that had anything to do with “art”. I always wanted to be an artist, though; I imagined that I would be painting large abstract canvasses when I grew up.

q)How would you describe your art?

a)Don’t know.Conceptual cartoonism? I hope it’s sort of direct. The process of making these things is rather time-consuming, I do four or five pieces a year.

q)Where do you get the inspiration for your art?

a)The newspapers, b-movies, t.v.commercials and everyday life.

q)What other artists inspire you?

a)Writers like for instance Elfride Jelinek, Michel Houllebecq and Douglas Coupland, grafic novelists like Charles Burnes and Daniel Clowes, film directors like Lucas Moodysson and a lot of other visual artists, too many to mention, not always the ones that make work simular to mine, it is more about an attitude.

q)What is your main medium of choice?

a)Sculpture and installation. The sculpture is mostly made of light-weight synthetics (all water-based and friendly to the environnement).

q)What are you working on now?

a)An installation in collaboration with a poet. It is about consumerism and child-prostitution.

q)Almost every artist has a special “mission”, a message they want to deliver or actions they want to provoke with their work. What’s your mission?

a)That’s a tough one. If I knew what the exact message was I don’t think there would be a need to make the work anymore … But, If I must, shortly: The message would be that life’s a bitch, and my mission to sort out who or what’s to blame. Without any result so far.

q)Your artworks often feature children in a context of violence, dirt and sex – they don’t fail in provoking unease and disgust in the viewer. How were your personal feelings during the working process?

a)I can get emotional or upset, but not all of the time. A single piece takes several months to make so that would be rather unpleasant. Sometimes I enjoy working on it in a malicious kind of way, but mostly I’m preoccupied with formal and technical issues.

q)Do those images come from personal experiences (e.g. travels to third world countries) or are they a product of your imagination / from watching the news / from listening to stories from friends/acquaintances?

a)It depends; some works are inspired by watching the news, some by disaster movies, some by everyday life: You don’t have to travel to a third world country to see people suffer. But mostly the images arise from the working process itself. It’s not just about what you see, but what it stands for. I’m always looking for images that can also serve as a metaphor. And of course the themes I choose orginate in personal experience, like with any other artist.

 

Show

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—-

 

*

p.s. Hey. ** _Black_Acrylic, Hi, Ben. Cool. I hope the Hejinian hits your mark. ** kenley, Hey! Yes, Sarah Kane, absolutely for sure. Okay, that play doesn’t sound bad. Of course the eating of his wife’s ashes is a plus. Yes, disagreeing friends who can depersonalise are the best. Keeps you percolating. Uh, hm, I don’t think I’ve actually seen any actual avant-garde performance or theater lately. There’s been kind of a paucity of that kind of work coming through Paris. Right now it’s all ‘immersive experience’ stuff, you know, walk- or sit through surround-projections of ‘trippy’ AI reality-bending stuff. It’s so empty. I should check more closely. Will do. ** Hugo, Hi, Hugo. You sound good. The last section of ‘God Jr.’ is my favorite thing I’ve ever written, so thank you. I started ‘The Sluts’ in the mid-90s. So, basically, I was working on it in the background while I wrote ‘Guide’, ‘Period’, ‘My Loose Thread’, and the early parts of ‘God Jr.’. ‘The Sluts’ came out just before ‘God Jr.’, but pretty close in time. So I finished off ‘God Jr.’ when I finished ‘The Sluts’, but it was about, oh, half finished by then. Luck with that someone whichever way it goes. And enjoy the confusion if you can. Love back. ** Carsten, Laziest question ever. There seemed to be a hopeful seeming update on Jost yesterday, so fingers extremely crossed. You’ve made me want to revisit ‘Zombie Birdhouse’. I don’t remember it very well. Maybe it’s grown into itself. RIP Tom Noonan, yes. ** Steeqhen, Pancakes will do that to you, if you gorge, which it’s hard not to do since they look so harmless. Interesting about the Lent connection. That makes sense. Oops about the German edition. The book itself is pretty attractive, as I recall. Meager compensation. ** HaRpEr //, If not being able to give up on things is a mental illness, I’ve got it too. That’s got a real plus side, as I don’t need to tell you or at least won’t eventually. Good news! Pray tell when the news gets de-cloaked. Rhys is so great. Huh, I’ll definitely go look for ‘www.RachelOrmont.com’. I don’t know or that director’s stuff at all. Thank you! ** Steve, Red Bamboo … I don’t remember it. Last time I was in NYC I was depressed to find that this great little Chinese place near Times Square that had the best cold sesame noodle ever and had been there since the 1950s closed. Fuckin’ hell. I say play your track and just say it’s by the musical moniker you use and let your listeners figure it out. Stephen is still involved in Southern Lord, but it was always more Greg’s project. Yes, he stewards quite a great label Ideologic Organ. It used to be a subset of Editions Mego, and now it’s a subset of Shelter. The Sub Pop thing was in the discussion phase for a long time. (Stephen is from Seattle originally). It’s good for Sunn0))). It makes things a lot easier, Stephen says. ** Uday, Owen Land is a good name. Nice syllables, nice rhythm. I’d be happy to wear it. You’re reading at an event that Ann Coulter as a speaker? Whoa, how is that possible? But still. Cool to read in NYC. ** Thom, Hi! Where can I find/hear your music? Really love the way you talk about it. Now I’m jonesing. Yes, the story as a place to work and play. Makes total sense. You can discover if your wishes need the girth of a longer form or not. And the zine plan sounds obviously very good. Zac and I tried to set up an ‘RT’ screening in Portland, but no venues we approached there were interested. Sad, but oh well. Thank you for the process talk about your story. It sounds kind of like the way I think about writing prose. Or I can totally get what you’re trying for, or I think I can. It’s always thrilling to find a writer who thinks and works like that with prose. It’s pretty rare. Most people I try to explain how I construct prose with get hazy-eyed pretty quickly. Anyway, what a pleasure. Enjoy everything your day has in store. ** Laura, Morning to you if it’s your morning at the moment. Seeing Land’s films projected makes such a difference. No surprise. Last night I went to an event where they showed two hours of films by Hollis Frampton, my cinema God along with Bresson, and I swear I was walking an inch off the ground for a couple of hours afterwards. Still not sure about the reading, but thank you. I don’t really mind when poems want to tell me what to think as long as they don’t also insist on inflating the author of the poem a la Walt Whitman and that kind of shit. One could only wish Almodovar would make a film like your dream at this point in his career. Okay, but I’m not going to watch ‘Heated Rivalry’. Just a hunch. Thanks about the ‘God Jr.’ squib. Like I told Hugo, that whole section of the novel is my best ever writing, I think. May your day spiral upwards from here. ** Right. Do you feel like strolling through my galerie today and looking at Harma Heikens’s stuff? See you tomorrow.

« Older posts

© 2026 DC's

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑